March Movement Supporters Rally Against Police Bid to Curb Immigration Protests

March Movement rallies against police bid to curb protests as supporters gathered outside the Durban High Court on Friday, 30 October 2026, to oppose an urgent legal application seeking to restrict demonstrations organised by the March and March movement.

The gathering took place as the South African Police Service (SAPS) and Acting Police Minister Firoz Cachalia pursued an interim court interdict against the group’s planned anti-illegal immigration protests.

The legal dispute has attracted significant attention amid rising tensions surrounding immigration, public safety and the right to peaceful assembly. It has also unfolded shortly before the upcoming local government elections, adding to the political sensitivity surrounding the demonstrations.

Supporters outside the court argued that the proposed restrictions threatened their constitutional rights. Authorities, meanwhile, raised concerns about intelligence reports suggesting that further demonstrations could result in serious incidents.

The Durban High Court hearing therefore places two important responsibilities under scrutiny: protecting the public and upholding the constitutional right to protest.

Durban High Court hears SAPS bid against March and March

The National Police Ministry and SAPS leadership in KwaZulu-Natal approached the Durban High Court seeking urgent intervention to stop further demonstrations by March and March.

According to the information presented in the dispute, police relied on crime intelligence warning of a possible plan to set fire to a Department of Home Affairs refugee reception centre in Berea, Durban.

Authorities also pointed to previous demonstrations that allegedly escalated into property damage, looting and disorder.

The State’s position is that preventing further protest action is necessary to reduce the risk of violence and protect public facilities and communities.

The application has placed the police response to the movement under legal scrutiny, particularly because the requested interdict could affect future demonstrations.

Police raise concerns about alleged arson threat

One of the most serious issues raised by authorities involves intelligence about an alleged plan to set fire to the refugee reception centre in Berea.

Such an incident could place employees, members of the public and people seeking assistance at risk.

The State’s concerns also relate to the potential consequences of further unrest in Durban, where immigration-related tensions have become increasingly sensitive.

However, the allegations have been strongly disputed by the movement’s representatives. They should not be treated as established facts unless supported by evidence accepted by the court.

The legal proceedings will allow the parties to present their respective positions before the judge considers whether an interim interdict is justified.

March and March supporters reject police application

Supporters of the March and March movement gathered outside the Durban High Court to demonstrate their opposition to the police application.

The group’s founder, Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma, and its legal representative, Xolani Zuma, rejected the allegations relating to the alleged arson plot.

They argued that the government’s attempt to restrict demonstrations amounted to an effort to silence citizens exercising their constitutional rights.

The movement’s representatives also questioned the use of state resources, arguing that government attention should focus on addressing undocumented immigration rather than restricting civic organisations.

For supporters, the court dispute is about more than whether another demonstration can take place. They see it as a broader question about the ability of citizens to organise, express their concerns and demand action from government.

Movement argues that peaceful assembly must be protected

South Africa’s Constitution protects the right to assemble, demonstrate, picket and present petitions peacefully and without weapons.

This right allows individuals and organisations to raise concerns about government policies and issues affecting their communities.

However, constitutional protection does not give demonstrators permission to commit crimes, damage property or threaten other people.

The challenge for the court is to consider whether the restrictions requested by the State are legally justified while ensuring that lawful protest activity remains protected.

The March Movement rallies against police bid to curb protests have consequently become part of a wider debate about the limits of protest rights and the responsibilities of law enforcement.

Fatal unrest increases pressure on authorities

The legal dispute comes amid reports of serious violence during recent anti-migrant demonstrations.

One incident involved a foreign national who was reportedly beaten to death by a mob in Durban.

The fatal incident has intensified concerns about the possibility of further violence and the safety of foreign nationals and local communities.

Authorities face pressure to prevent similar incidents while ensuring that public-order operations remain lawful.

The situation also highlights the danger of allowing immigration debates to develop into hostility or attacks against individuals because of their nationality.

Public concerns about immigration can be raised through lawful political participation and peaceful demonstrations. Violence, intimidation and attacks on people cannot be justified by those concerns.

SANDF soldiers deployed to support law enforcement

President Cyril Ramaphosa reportedly deployed more than 500 South African National Defence Force (SANDF) soldiers to support law enforcement operations in KwaZulu-Natal.

The deployment comes as authorities seek to strengthen public-order operations amid concerns about escalating tensions.

The military support is intended to assist law enforcement in maintaining stability during a sensitive period.

The presence of additional security personnel also reflects the seriousness of the situation facing authorities in the province.

However, any security operation must respect the law and the constitutional rights of people who are participating in peaceful demonstrations.

Political groups show support outside court

The dispute has also attracted political attention, with members of opposition movements reportedly joining supporters outside the Durban High Court.

Representatives and supporters linked to the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party and ActionSA were among those who showed solidarity with the demonstrators.

Their presence has added a political dimension to the court proceedings, particularly as the country approaches local government elections.

Immigration has become a prominent subject in public debate, with political organisations taking different positions on border management, undocumented migration and the government’s response.

The involvement of political groups demonstrates how the legal battle has moved beyond the immediate question of whether March and March may hold further demonstrations.

It has become part of a broader national conversation about government accountability, immigration policy, public safety and freedom of expression.

What happens next in the Durban High Court?

The Durban High Court must consider the arguments presented by the police ministry and the March and March movement before deciding whether to grant the requested interim interdict.

If the court grants the application, the movement could face restrictions on further demonstrations in accordance with the terms of the order.

If the application is dismissed, the group may retain the ability to organise protests, subject to applicable laws and any other valid restrictions.

The court could also issue an order with specific conditions rather than granting or refusing all the relief requested.

It is important to distinguish between an application for an interdict and a final court order. The police request does not automatically mean that the movement has been permanently prohibited from demonstrating.

The outcome will be closely watched by civil society organisations, political parties, law enforcement agencies and communities affected by the protests.

Conclusion: March Movement rallies highlight national tensions

The March Movement rallies against police bid to curb protests highlight the growing tension between public-order concerns and constitutional freedoms in South Africa.

The SAPS and police ministry argue that urgent court intervention is necessary because of concerns about possible violence and threats to public facilities.

March and March, meanwhile, maintains that the application threatens the right of citizens to demonstrate peacefully and raise concerns about immigration.

The Durban High Court now faces the task of weighing the evidence, considering the legal arguments and determining whether the restrictions requested by authorities are justified.

As the country approaches local government elections, the case is likely to remain an important test of how South Africa balances freedom of assembly, public safety and the rule of law.

References from mainstream media

News24: “March and March supporters rally outside Durban High Court as SAPS seeks interdict” – https://www.news24.com/news24/southafrica/news/march-and-march-supporters-rally-outside-durban-high-court-as-saps-seeks-interdict-20261030
IOL: “High stakes at Durban High Court: March and March movement pushes back against SAPS protest ban” – https://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-and-courts/2026-10-30-high-stakes-at-durban-high-court-march-and-march-movement-pushes-back-against-saps-protest-ban/
eNCA: “MK Party, ActionSA members join March and March protest outside Durban High Court” – https://www.enca.com/news-top-stories/mk-party-actionsa-members-join-march-and-march-protest-outside-durban-high-court
SABC News: “Police bid to halt anti-immigration protests met with fierce resistance at Durban High Court” – https://www.sabcnews.com/sabcnews/police-bid-to-halt-anti-immigration-protests-met-with-fierce-resistance-at-durban-high-court/

Support Independent Journalism with eKayNews! 📰✨

At eKayNews, we are dedicated to bringing you honest, independent, and reliable news. But we can’t do it alone—independent journalism relies on the strength and generosity of its community.

If you value our work, please consider supporting us today! You can help keep us going by choosing a subscription or simply buying us a one-off virtual coffee:

👉 Support us here: ekaynews.co.za/subscribe-form/

You can also support our mission by visiting our main site at www.ekaynews.co.za and following @eKayNews on all social media platforms.

Thank you so much for your incredible generosity and for being part of our journey! 🙏💙

March Movement rallies against police bid to curb protests