ANC flags Madonsela’s past brief as Section 89 impeachment leader decision looms
ANC flags Madonsela as Section 89 decision looms, with questions surrounding the proposed appointment of Advocate Thandazani Madonsela as evidence leader now referred back to the parliamentary committee responsible for the process.
National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza has made it clear that her office will not interfere in the internal processes of the Section 89 Impeachment Committee, despite concerns raised by ANC Secretary-General Fikile Mbalula about Madonsela’s previous involvement in legal matters relating to impeachment rules.
The development comes as the Section 89 Impeachment Committee considers its next steps and prepares to select an evidence leader to assist with its work.
Parliament has stressed that Mbalula’s communication should not be interpreted as a formal objection to Madonsela’s recommendation.
Thoko Didiza refers concerns to committee
Thoko Didiza, the Speaker of the National Assembly, has referred the communication from Mbalula to the chairperson of the committee.
According to Parliament spokesperson Moloto Mothapo, the issues raised by Mbalula concern matters that fall directly within the committee’s deliberations and decision-making processes.
This means the Speaker’s office will not make the decision on behalf of the committee.
Instead, the committee itself will have to consider the concerns and determine how it wishes to proceed.
“The matters raised relate directly to the deliberations and decisions of the committee and therefore properly fall within the committee’s processes,” Mothapo said.
He added that the Speaker had therefore referred the communication to the committee chairperson for consideration.
The approach places the responsibility firmly with the committee, rather than the office of the Speaker.
ANC flags Madonsela over previous legal briefing
The controversy centres on Thandazani Madonsela, an advocate who had been recommended to serve as the committee’s evidence leader.
Mbalula informed Didiza that Madonsela had previously been briefed to provide legal advice to the ANC on matters relating to the impeachment rules and processes.
The disclosure has raised questions about whether Madonsela’s previous involvement with the governing party could affect his proposed role in the parliamentary process.
However, based on Parliament’s explanation, Mbalula’s communication was not formally characterised as an objection to the committee’s recommendation.
Instead, the concerns have been placed before the committee so that its members can consider them through their established processes.
The distinction is important because the committee remains responsible for determining who will ultimately assist it as evidence leader.
Section 89 Impeachment Committee retains authority
The Section 89 Impeachment Committee has already determined that it will select an evidence leader through its own processes.
The evidence leader is expected to assist the committee with its work, particularly as it considers matters connected to the impeachment process.
Parliament said the committee had determined that the selection would be handled internally.
“Once the committee has concluded its decision-making process, the parliamentary administration will facilitate the necessary procurement and administrative processes,” Mothapo explained.
This means the administrative machinery of Parliament will only become involved after the committee has completed its decision-making.
The latest development therefore does not represent a final decision on Madonsela’s appointment.
Instead, it introduces another issue for the committee to consider before the process can move forward.
Fikile Mbalula raises concerns with Speaker
Fikile Mbalula, the ANC secretary-general, brought the issue directly to the Speaker’s attention.
His communication focused on Madonsela’s previous briefing by the ANC in relation to impeachment rules and processes.
The concerns come at a sensitive point for the parliamentary process, as the committee considers the appointment of an individual who would play an important role in assisting its work.
For Mbalula and the ANC, Madonsela’s previous legal involvement with the party is therefore a matter that has been placed on record.
However, Parliament has made it clear that the Speaker will not intervene in a matter that falls within the committee’s mandate.
The concerns will consequently have to be dealt with by the committee itself.
Why the evidence leader matters
The appointment of an evidence leader is an important administrative and procedural step for the committee.
The individual selected will assist members as they conduct their work and deal with the evidence and issues placed before them.
Because the committee is responsible for its own selection process, members will have to consider the information raised about potential candidates before making their final decision.
In this case, the issue involving Thandazani Madonsela centres on his previous legal briefing to the ANC.
The committee will therefore have an opportunity to assess the relevance of that previous work and determine whether it affects his suitability for the role.
Parliament’s statement indicates that the matter will be handled within the committee rather than being determined by the Speaker.
South African Parliament stresses due process
The latest development highlights the role of the South African Parliament in maintaining a distinction between political communications and formal committee processes.
Mbalula’s communication was brought to the Speaker, but the Speaker did not take a decision on the substance of the concerns.
Instead, Didiza referred the matter to the committee chairperson.
This approach means that the committee remains responsible for considering the matter and deciding what action, if any, should follow.
It also reinforces the principle that parliamentary committees are expected to conduct their deliberations within their own mandates and procedures.
The administration will then provide the required support once the committee has completed its decision-making.
What happens next?
The immediate next step is for the Section 89 Impeachment Committee to consider the communication regarding Madonsela.
The committee will have to determine how it wishes to deal with the concerns raised by Mbalula before finalising the selection of its evidence leader.
At this stage, Parliament has not indicated that Madonsela has been formally rejected or that the committee has abandoned his recommendation.
Equally, there has been no indication that his appointment has been finalised.
The committee’s own deliberations will therefore be crucial in determining what happens next.
The parliamentary administration will only facilitate the procurement and related administrative processes once the committee has concluded its decision-making.
YOU MAY LIKE:
ANC flags Madonsela as process moves forward
The development comes as the parliamentary impeachment process continues to attract political attention.
ANC flags Madonsela as Section 89 decision looms captures the central issue now before the committee: whether concerns about a proposed evidence leader’s previous legal work should affect the appointment.
For now, the Speaker has chosen not to interfere.
Instead, Thoko Didiza has placed the matter where Parliament says it belongs — before the committee responsible for making the decision.
The outcome will depend on the committee’s deliberations and its assessment of the issues raised.
Until that process is completed, Madonsela’s position remains a matter for consideration rather than a final appointment.
The South African Parliament is expected to continue facilitating the process once the committee has reached its decision, while the Speaker’s office maintains its position that it will not interfere with the committee’s internal deliberations.
References
- IOL – Mbalula says Parliament should wait before deciding Ramaphosa’s Section 89 case
Reports on Fikile Mbalula’s position on the Section 89 process, including the ANC’s approach and National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza’s role.
Read the IOL report - TimesLIVE – Madonsela questions Phala Phala report
Provides background on the Section 89 impeachment process and the role of legal and constitutional considerations surrounding parliamentary impeachment proceedings.
Read the TimesLIVE report - The Citizen – Advocate Thandazani Madonsela legal proceedings
Provides background on Advocate Thandazani Madonsela and his work as a senior advocate in South African legal proceedings.
Read The Citizen report
Support Independent Journalism with eKayNews! 📰✨
At eKayNews, we are dedicated to bringing you honest, independent, and reliable news. But we can’t do it alone—independent journalism relies on the strength and generosity of its community.
If you value our work, please consider supporting us today! You can help keep us going by choosing a subscription or simply buying us a one-off virtual coffee:
👉 Support us here: ekaynews.co.za/subscribe-form/
You can also support our mission by visiting our main site at www.ekaynews.co.za and following @eKayNews on all social media platforms.
Thank you so much for your incredible generosity and for being part of our journey! 🙏💙
